Introduction to NLP Meta-Model
by Loren Larsen
Last updated: 4/9/2006
META-MODEL
The Meta-Model was first described by John Grinder and Richard Bandler in their book Structure of Magic vol. 1. In their observation of successful therapists, like Virginia Satir, they began to notice systematic use of certain language patterns that allowed these therapists to ask just the right question and enabled them to often get right to the heart of the matter. This page describes the meta-model patterns.
Introduction
John Grinder was a professor of linguistics at the
University
of California at Santa
Cruz, and his area of speciality was something relatively new at the
time called
Transformation Grammar. The meta-model is based loosely on
some of that model of
linguistics, particularly the notion of surface structure
and deep structure.
Basically, surface structure describes the words being used, and deep
structure represents
the intuition a person has about the words that enables them to make
sense of it.
The surface structure and deep structure are different, in that the
surface structure
contains deletions, distortions, and generalizations. These 3
processes, while
essential to functioning in the world, can also allow people to walk
around with
limitations in their view of the world. For example, if
someone walks up to you and
hits on the head, and then another person, you might conclude that you
should avoid all
people because "People always hit me on the head." It might
useful for
preserving ones safety in certain situations, but not very useful in
forming wonderful and
long-lasting relationships. The meta-model provides a way for
you to open up
possibilities in what people say...
The Model
|
PATTERN |
RESPONSE |
|
DISTORTIONS |
|
MIND READING
|
|
LOST PERFORMATIVE
|
|
CAUSE & EFFECT
|
|
COMPLEX EQUIVALENCE
|
|
PRESUPPOSITIONS
|
How specifically was your previous manager unresonable? |
| GENERALIZATIONS | |
| UNIVERSAL QUANTIFIERS (words like: always, all, every, everyone, never, no one)
|
He's always nicer to you?
Has there ever been a time when she listened to you? Everyone? |
| MODAL OPERATORS (of possibility: can, will of impossibility: can't, won't of necessity: must, have to, it is necessary)
|
Have you ever been able to do that?
What would happen if you didn't? |
|
DELETIONS |
|
| NOMINALIZATIONS (verbs that have been made into nouns; the rule is, if it's a noun and you can't put it in a wheelbarrow then it's a nominalization;)
|
What were you communicating about?
What about being free is important to her? How does he visualize? |
| UNSPECIFIED VERBS (verbs where some detail of the action is not specified)
|
How specifically did he reject you?
How did he touch you? |
| LACK OF REFERENTIAL INDEX (an action is specified, but WHO is doing the action is left unspecified. Put another way, it's any non-referring noun phrase)
|
Who stole the candy from your house?
Who is it not fair for? |
| COMPARATIVE DELETIONS (A comparison is made, but what it is being compared to is unspecified; included words like: better, worse, more, less, best, worst)
|
Better than who?
Compared to who? |